A clear and accessible breakdown of whether businesses can claim GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) refunds when closing down. Learn what the law says, how other countries handle it, the Sikkim High Court’s conflicting rulings, and why experts are calling for change.
Refund of GST ITC on Business Closure — A Clear and Concise Overview
1. The Core Issue: ITC Refunds When a Business Shuts Down
The question of whether unused GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be refunded when a business closes has created a major legal debate. While ITC normally offsets GST liability, leftover credit often remains at closure. GST law only allows refunds in cases of zero-rated supplies or inverted duty structures. Since business closure isn’t one of these, companies are left without a clear refund option.
2. What the Law Currently Requires
Under the present GST framework, refunds are allowed only in the limited situations specifically mentioned in Section 54(3). Additionally, Section 29(5) mandates that when cancelling GST registration, any remaining ITC must be reversed. This means businesses cannot claim a refund of their unused ITC simply because they are shutting down. As a result, the legal structure effectively treats such ITC as forfeited.
3. How Other Countries Handle ITC at Closure
In contrast, countries like Australia, the UK, Canada, and New Zealand offer more flexible VAT/GST systems. They allow businesses to claim refunds of unutilized input taxes even when they close operations. This avoids financial loss and ensures the tax system remains revenue-neutral for businesses. India's stricter approach therefore stands out compared to international practices.
4. Conflicting Views from the Sikkim High Court
The legal debate intensified after two conflicting rulings from the Sikkim High Court in the SICPA India case. A Single Judge initially held that refunds should be allowed since the law doesn’t expressly prohibit them. However, a Division Bench later overturned this, stressing that refunds are statutory rights and cannot extend beyond the situations listed in the law. It concluded that refunds on business closure are not permissible.
5. Current Legal Position and Expert Opinions
With the Division Bench’s ruling prevailing, unused ITC cannot be refunded solely due to closure of business. Many experts argue that this results in unfair loss to taxpayers and benefits the government unjustly. They believe a legal amendment is needed to allow limited refunds with safeguards. Until such changes occur, businesses must reverse any remaining ITC when cancelling their GST registration.
In short, the law currently leaves businesses without the option to reclaim unused ITC when they shut down, even though other countries offer more flexible systems. The Sikkim High Court’s final ruling reinforces this restriction, highlighting the need for clearer and fairer legal provisions. As discussions continue, taxpayers and experts alike hope for future reforms that bring greater balance and transparency to the GST framework.
Add us as a preferred source on Google »